From b.gohla@gmx.de Fri Sep 14 00:30:37 2001
Return-Path: <b.gohla@gmx.de>
X-Sender: b.gohla@gmx.de
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_1); 14 Sep 2001 07:30:37 -0000
Received: (qmail 73228 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2001 07:28:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27)
  by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 14 Sep 2001 07:28:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.gmx.net) (213.165.64.20)
  by mta2 with SMTP; 14 Sep 2001 07:28:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 23201 invoked by uid 0); 14 Sep 2001 06:16:05 -0000
Received: from b7a14.pppool.de (HELO linux) (213.7.122.20)
  by mail.gmx.net (mp009-rz3) with SMTP; 14 Sep 2001 06:16:05 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Reply-To: b.gohla@gmx.de
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] (from lojban-beginners) pi'e
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 08:19:41 +0200
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0109131437380.7222-100000@e4e.oac.uci.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0109131437380.7222-100000@e4e.oac.uci.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01091408194100.01115@linux>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: =?utf-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn=20Gohla?= <b.gohla@gmx.de>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 13 September 2001 23:48, Nick NICHOLAS wrote:
> The YY-MM-DD format which the ISO has prescribes is what I've been using
> for the past ten years; I was taught it as an engineering student. There'=
s
> a lot of it about. The kind of "noone else
> is doing it, quasigovernmental whim" stuff pc brings up is (a) bogus
> (though characteristically libertarian :-) ), and
> (b) the reason why the metric system will never happen in the States.
> It's nonsense, but it's you guys' loss.
>
> The Lojban-internal reasons adduced are also not compelling to me. Noone'=
s
> going to confuse dates with trailing sumti; it'd be quite OK not to have
> them behave the same. After all, Linnaean taxonomy is not going to work
> like that in Lojban either: you'll still be naming Genus and Species, and
> omitting every taxon above it.

i am getting the feeling that there is quite a tendency in lojban to=20
overspecify things. i consider date formatting to be beyond the realm of th=
e=20
language itself, just like alot of the metaphysics we tend to talk about. s=
o=20
instead of embossing a specific world view into lojban we should concentrat=
e=20
on making as much as possible easily and clearly expressible.=20=20
- --=20
- --------------------
panic ("No CPUs found. System halted.\n");
2.4.3 linux/arch/parisc/kernel/setup.c
pub 1024D/834F4976 2001-01-07 Bj=C3=B6rn Gohla (Wissenschaftler, Weltb=C3=
=BCrger)=20
<b.gohla@gmx.de>
Key fingerprint =3D 9FF4 FEDA CCDF DA0E 14D5 8129 6C14 3C39 834F 4976
sub 1024g/29571FE2 2001-01-07
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7oaGCbBQ8OYNPSXYRAg1nAKCqURD6ShilMH16EDK5+p1gCQ7ccwCff3yO
puXrstgYNUSziZspOusWJBM=3D
=3DamuI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

