From a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com Fri Sep 14 18:07:13 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_2); 15 Sep 2001 01:07:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 74856 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2001 00:33:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 15 Sep 2001 00:33:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mta02-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.42) by mta3 with SMTP; 15 Sep 2001 00:33:52 -0000 Received: from andrew ([62.253.84.163]) by mta02-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP id <20010915003350.NOJY29790.mta02-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew> for ; Sat, 15 Sep 2001 01:33:50 +0100 Reply-To: To: Subject: RE: [lojban] li'i (was: Another stab at a Record on ce'u Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 01:33:05 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010910034152.00ca9bc0@pop.cais.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 From: "And Rosta" lojbab: > At 06:04 PM 8/31/01 +0100, And Rosta wrote: > >{le si'o ce'u broda kei be mi} = my notion of Broda > > That might be your notion of "le broda", just as > > {le si'o broda ce'u kei be mi} > > might be your notion of "le se broda" > > But let us turn to some abstractions that people often label as Ideas, like > "Freedom" and "Peace". I can't figure out whether the ce'u goes in those > or why you would want to use one. Every place is filled by ce'u. It remains undecided whether any of those ce'u can be unambiguously covert/elided. --And.