From lojbab@lojban.org Fri Sep 14 18:15:41 2001
Return-Path: <lojbab@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_2); 15 Sep 2001 01:15:40 -0000
Received: (qmail 80638 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2001 00:42:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142)
  by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 15 Sep 2001 00:42:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO stmpy-4.cais.net) (205.252.14.74)
  by mta3 with SMTP; 15 Sep 2001 00:42:13 -0000
Received: from bob.lojban.org (ppp17.net-A.cais.net [205.252.61.17])
  by stmpy-4.cais.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f8F0fst34934;
  Fri, 14 Sep 2001 20:42:03 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010914203342.00bf6100@pop.cais.com>
X-Sender: vir1036@pop.cais.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 20:38:51 -0400
To: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
Subject: Re: 24hr GMT (was: (from lojban-beginners) pi'e
Cc: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0109141855280.18113-100000@reva.sixgirls.org
  >
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010914171357.00bf2600@pop.cais.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>

At 07:00 PM 9/14/01 -0400, Invent Yourself wrote:
>On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) wrote:
> > BTW. No one has mentioned one bit of the nitty gritty of this particular
> > world standard, but don't most standards insist on 24 hour clock time? Do
> > the world standard organizations believe that they will get the world to
> > use a 24 hour clock in everyday life? (Note that at one point I tried to
> > get Lojbanists to consider a 24 hour clock as an option, but the community
> > outvoted me.)
>
>Ultimately we must all adopt a 24 hour GMT clock -- a single time zone for
>the whole globe. Arbitrary geographical time zones are already obsolete
>for internet servers and the military, both of which cannot be bothered
>with lists of offsets. As our interactions become more global and less
>local (parochial), the wisdom and efficiency of such a system will become
>increasingly clear. As for the 24 hour aspect, there are no sane arguments
>against it.

I argued this at one point and lost (not all that many years ago). The 
community wanted 12 hour clock using decimal numbers . IIRC, I was roundly 
ridiculed even to think of teaching alternatives and "letting usage decide".

lojbab
--
lojbab lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org


