From rob@twcny.rr.com Fri Sep 14 19:01:56 2001
Return-Path: <rob@twcny.rr.com>
X-Sender: rob@twcny.rr.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_2); 15 Sep 2001 02:01:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 77862 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2001 01:52:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27)
  by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 15 Sep 2001 01:52:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mailout6.nyroc.rr.com) (24.92.226.125)
  by mta2 with SMTP; 15 Sep 2001 01:52:55 -0000
Received: from mail1.twcny.rr.com (mail1-1 [24.92.226.139])
  by mailout6.nyroc.rr.com (8.11.6/Road Runner 1.12) with ESMTP id f8F1ppw20904
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 21:51:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from riff ([24.92.246.4]) by mail1.twcny.rr.com
  (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223
  ID# 0-59787U250000L250000S0V35) with ESMTP id com
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 21:51:50 -0400
Received: from rob by riff with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian))
  id 15i4d7-0000Zu-00
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 21:52:25 -0400
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 21:52:24 -0400
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] (from lojban-beginners) pi'e
Message-ID: <20010914215224.A2071@twcny.rr.com>
Reply-To: rob@twcny.rr.com
References: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0109141619590.19850-100000@e4e.oac.uci.edu> <4.3.2.7.2.20010914210625.00aacf00@pop.cais.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010914210625.00aacf00@pop.cais.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i
X-Is-It-Not-Nifty: www.sluggy.com
From: Rob Speer <rob@twcny.rr.com>

de'i li 2001:9:14 : 21:12:17 ti'u la EDT la lojbab. pu cusku di'e
> Now maybe we shouldn't be hamstrung by the baseline if enough people want a 
> change, but part of the reason for having a baseline is to hamstring those 
> who would change by fiat. (If you evolve a change through usage, of 
> course, I cannot argue with you).

I think the date issue is one that would be very easy to evolve by usage. There
will never be a 2001st day of any month, and so there is no need for
conventions to attempt to figure out which form someone is using.

Now for a slight digression. Is ":" representing {pi'e} officially recognized
anywhere, or is it just a shortcut in jbofi'e? It is nice to have.
-- 
la rab.spir
noi sarji zo gumri


