From cowan@ccil.org Sat Sep 15 11:08:00 2001
Return-Path: <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
X-Sender: cowan@mercury.ccil.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_2); 15 Sep 2001 18:08:00 -0000
Received: (qmail 15003 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2001 15:42:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142)
  by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 15 Sep 2001 15:42:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mercury.ccil.org) (192.190.237.100)
  by mta3 with SMTP; 15 Sep 2001 15:42:51 -0000
Received: from cowan by mercury.ccil.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
  id 15iHac-0003vG-00; Sat, 15 Sep 2001 11:42:42 -0400
Subject: Re: [lojban] A revised ce'u proposal involving si'o (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0109141735410.19850-100000@e4e.oac.uci.edu> from
  Nick NICHOLAS at "Sep 14, 2001 06:16:31 pm"
To: Nick NICHOLAS <nicholas@uci.edu>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 11:42:42 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E15iHac-0003vG-00@mercury.ccil.org>
X-eGroups-From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>

Nick NICHOLAS scripsit:

> Lojbab, please read the pertinent discussion on the List and the Wiki
> before you say this kind of things. It has.

Why should Lojbab lack the privilege of exposing his ignorance
on the public mailing list, which mi'a exercise so freely and so often?
Really, Nick, methinks this is a vestige of the despised Supplicatory Model.

-- 
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org
Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact,
at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door.
--sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan

