From jjllambias@hotmail.com Sat Sep 15 11:52:14 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_2); 15 Sep 2001 18:52:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 58227 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2001 16:45:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 15 Sep 2001 16:45:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.219) by mta1 with SMTP; 15 Sep 2001 16:45:44 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 15 Sep 2001 09:45:44 -0700 Received: from 200.69.11.187 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sat, 15 Sep 2001 16:45:43 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.69.11.187] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: RE: [lojban] noxemol ce'u Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 16:45:43 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Sep 2001 16:45:44.0187 (UTC) FILETIME=[DCB7B4B0:01C13E05] From: "Jorge Llambias" la and cusku di'e >1. What is the difference, if any, between > > {la djumbos frica la tamtum le ka ce'u barda} > >and > > {la djumbos frica la tamtum le ka xu kau ce'u barda} > >? The second one is clear, they differ in whether or not they are big, i.e. one is big and the other isn't. The first one is incomplete, as you need to have some kau in the te frica. For example it could be interpreted as {le ka ce'u barda makau}, they differ in what dimension they are big in. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp