From pycyn@aol.com Sat Sep 15 11:58:40 2001
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_2); 15 Sep 2001 18:58:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 86628 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2001 17:01:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 15 Sep 2001 17:01:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r06.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.102)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 15 Sep 2001 17:01:11 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com
  by imo-r06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.7.) id r.110.5604f3a (4596)
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Sat, 15 Sep 2001 13:01:06 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <110.5604f3a.28d4e352@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 13:01:06 EDT
Subject: Re: [lojban] A revised ce'u proposal involving si'o (fwd)
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_110.5604f3a.28d4e352_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10535
From: pycyn@aol.com

--part1_110.5604f3a.28d4e352_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 9/14/2001 8:11:58 PM Central Daylight Time, 
a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com writes:


> As for Laadan, it 
> > is clearly too inchoate to be much use as a conlang. 
> 
> Not too inchoate by Lojbab's standards. For Lojbab, the more inchoate the
> better -- the more inchoate the language is, the more there is for Usage
> to Decide.
> 

Oh, even Lojbab (the one of your rhetoric even) would insist on a grammar and 
a phonology, neither of which doth Laadan possess in record.

--part1_110.5604f3a.28d4e352_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"><FONT SIZE=2>In a message dated 9/14/2001 8:11:58 PM Central Daylight Time, a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com writes:
<BR>
<BR>
<BR><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">As for Laadan, it 
<BR>&gt; is clearly too inchoate to be much use as a conlang. &nbsp;
<BR>
<BR>Not too inchoate by Lojbab's standards. For Lojbab, the more inchoate the
<BR>better -- the more inchoate the language is, the more there is for Usage
<BR>to Decide.
<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
<BR>Oh, even Lojbab (the one of your rhetoric even) would insist on a grammar and a phonology, neither of which doth Laadan possess in record.</FONT></HTML>

--part1_110.5604f3a.28d4e352_boundary--

