From pycyn@aol.com Sun Sep 16 01:32:07 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_2); 16 Sep 2001 08:32:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 58791 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2001 08:31:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 16 Sep 2001 08:31:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d07.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.39) by mta3 with SMTP; 16 Sep 2001 08:31:48 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-d07.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.7.) id r.3d.1166af59 (9665) for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 04:31:44 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3d.1166af59.28d5bd70@aol.com> Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 04:31:44 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] A revised ce'u proposal involving si'o To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_3d.1166af59.28d5bd70_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10535 From: pycyn@aol.com --part1_3d.1166af59.28d5bd70_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/15/2001 6:18:18 PM Central Daylight Time, a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com writes: > > > There indeed must be a way for a bridi to function as a sumti (tho it's > > > unclear to me why there must be a way for a bridi to function as a > > > selbri, which is what NU gives us), but the only NU that is > indispensible > > > is du'u kei be zi'o. All other NU could be replaced by other selbri > > > with a du'u kei be zi'o sumti. > > > > A mysterious paragraph. Are you sure of it? > > Yes. I can't see any snages. > How does it work? What, for example, replaces {ni} or (this is apparently crucial) {si'o}? I think a chart for all the NU is called for. --part1_3d.1166af59.28d5bd70_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/15/2001 6:18:18 PM Central Daylight Time, a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com writes:


> > There indeed must be a way for a bridi to function as a sumti (tho it's
> > unclear to me why there must be a way for a bridi to function as a
> > selbri, which is what NU gives us), but the only NU that is indispensible
> > is du'u kei be zi'o. All other NU could be replaced by other selbri
> > with a du'u kei be zi'o sumti.
>
> A mysterious paragraph. Are you sure of it?

Yes. I can't see any snages.


How does it work? What, for example, replaces {ni} or (this is apparently crucial) {si'o}?  I think a chart for all the  NU is called for.
--part1_3d.1166af59.28d5bd70_boundary--