From jay.kominek@colorado.edu Mon Sep 17 17:19:24 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: kominek@ucsub.colorado.edu X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_2); 18 Sep 2001 00:19:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 4132 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2001 19:45:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 17 Sep 2001 19:45:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucsub.colorado.edu) (128.138.129.12) by mta1 with SMTP; 17 Sep 2001 19:45:48 -0000 Received: from ucsub.colorado.edu (kominek@ucsub.colorado.edu [128.138.129.12]) by ucsub.colorado.edu (8.11.6/8.11.2/ITS-5.0/student) with ESMTP id f8HJjlS18579 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 13:45:47 -0600 (MDT) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 13:45:47 -0600 (MDT) To: Subject: Re: [lojban] 2 letter code? In-Reply-To: <20010917084806.L32009@digitalkingdom.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE From: Jay Kominek On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > It is art-lojban, not 2-letter, and it is quite official (but IANA has > > not yet posted it). See http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3066.txt for the > > framework for assigning language tags. > > As far as I can tell, they've posted very few indeed: > > http://www.iana.org/assignments/language-tags > > What's the tag for English under the same scheme? 'en' RFC3066 does not replace ISO the set of language tags, merely extend the set. (Which is why there aren't many of them.) - Jay Kominek Plus =C3=A7a change, plus c'est la m=C3=AAme chose