From pycyn@aol.com Tue Sep 18 09:46:45 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_2); 18 Sep 2001 16:46:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 50319 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2001 16:46:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 18 Sep 2001 16:46:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m03.mx.aol.com) (64.12.136.6) by mta2 with SMTP; 18 Sep 2001 16:46:44 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-m03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.7.) id r.14a.130220d (17379) for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 12:46:12 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <14a.130220d.28d8d454@aol.com> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 12:46:12 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: META : Who is everyone (and what are they saying) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_14a.130220d.28d8d454_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10535 From: pycyn@aol.com --part1_14a.130220d.28d8d454_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/18/2001 7:30:46 AM Central Daylight Time, gordon.dyke@bluewin.ch writes: > Oh! I'd best watch my step: either I argue too well and get nidja (le nidja > be la pycyn. fu lenu ri jinga djica) or I get written off as a hopeless > student of '85 %^> Actually, I find that iff I don't have to look at them, students are too bad and if they are actually arguing about something the tempatation is to bgive 'em some slack and do metamentoring ("that isn't a very strong way to make that point -- which is, by the way pretty hopeless -- but the best way to make what case can be made is ..."). And clear wins get a round of e-champagne. --part1_14a.130220d.28d8d454_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/18/2001 7:30:46 AM Central Daylight Time, gordon.dyke@bluewin.ch writes:


Oh! I'd best watch my step: either I argue too well and get nidja (le nidja
be la pycyn. fu lenu ri jinga djica) or I get written off as a hopeless
student of '85 %^>


Actually, I find that iff I don't have to look at them, students are too bad and if they are actually arguing about something the tempatation is to bgive 'em some slack and do metamentoring ("that isn't a very strong way to make that point -- which is, by the way pretty hopeless -- but the best way to make what case can be made is ...").  And clear wins get a round of e-champagne. --part1_14a.130220d.28d8d454_boundary--