From lojbab@lojban.org Wed Sep 19 15:30:52 2001
Return-Path: <lojbab@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_2); 19 Sep 2001 22:30:38 -0000
Received: (qmail 68402 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2001 22:30:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142)
  by 10.1.1.221 with QMQP; 19 Sep 2001 22:30:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO stmpy-4.cais.net) (205.252.14.74)
  by mta3 with SMTP; 19 Sep 2001 22:30:52 -0000
Received: from bob.lojban.org (ppp18.net-A.cais.net [205.252.61.18])
  by stmpy-4.cais.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f8JMUot28201
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 18:30:50 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010919182430.00e58220@pop.cais.com>
X-Sender: vir1036@pop.cais.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 18:27:35 -0400
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] META : Who is everyone (and what are they saying)
In-Reply-To: <F176d1dkgdUam4gY3sh0000b1d0@hotmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>

At 02:00 AM 9/19/01 +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote:
>As for {ckaji le ka daplu}, can something that is not daplu
>have the property of being daplu? I can't see any difference
>between {ko'a daplu} and {ko'a ckaji le ka ce'u daplu}.

Which is one reason why I haven't bought into the current concept of 
ka. Using the ideas of fuzzy logic it is quite possible for something to 
display some of the characteristics of ce'u broda, but not all of them.

lojbab
--
lojbab lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org


