From mark@kli.org Wed Sep 19 20:43:19 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: mark@kli.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_2); 20 Sep 2001 03:43:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 9212 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2001 03:43:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by 10.1.1.224 with QMQP; 20 Sep 2001 03:43:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO n29.groups.yahoo.com) (10.1.2.184) by mta1 with SMTP; 20 Sep 2001 03:43:19 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: mark@kli.org Received: from [10.1.2.240] by b05.egroups.com with NNFMP; 20 Sep 2001 03:43:19 -0000 Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 03:43:14 -0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Laadan [was: Re: [lojban] A revised ce'u proposal involving si'o (fwd) Message-ID: <9oboki+qa1r@eGroups.com> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 1040 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster X-Originating-IP: 162.33.229.2 From: mark@kli.org --- In lojban@y..., "michael helsem" wrote: > >From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" > > >Actually, Laadan was more thoroughly designed than you give it credit > >for. SHE did write it up in a book, and apparently there has been a small > >circle of people who got to minimal conversational ability with it. > > > > yes; i have the book, & while it's not as thorough as a poet > might wish, it does lay out enough to get started. and i have > to say, it is an interesting sketch. but it hasn't received > the intense usage & development that Klingon (which started > at about the same point) has seen. i'm not even sure if anyone > besides the inventor has written in it... I have the book as well (well, someplace), and indeed it is quite an interesting language, and deserving of more coverage than it's gotten. I once thought about writing some in it, but nothing came of that. Well, someday. ~mark ------------ l'adam m'`arkhei lev, ume'adonay ma`aneh lashon -- High Holiday Liturgy