From jjllambias@hotmail.com Wed Sep 19 20:46:42 2001
Return-Path: <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_2); 20 Sep 2001 03:46:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 58839 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2001 03:46:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by 10.1.1.223 with QMQP; 20 Sep 2001 03:46:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n35.groups.yahoo.com) (10.1.1.40)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 20 Sep 2001 03:46:42 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: jjllambias@hotmail.com
Received: from [10.1.10.110] by mu.egroups.com with NNFMP; 20 Sep 2001 03:46:42 -0000
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 03:46:41 -0000
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: META : Who is everyone (and what are they saying)
Message-ID: <9obor1+jci1@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010919183015.00cbcf00@pop.cais.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 864
X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
X-Originating-IP: 200.41.247.44
From: jjllambias@hotmail.com


la lojbab cusku di'e

> >I have, though, seen one indication of zipfing down of lujvo:
> >
> > tilju x1 is a pedant [Adjective pedantic] (This was made by 
> > shortening the
> > lujvo tilju'edu'u, which is perhaps the most 'proper' word 
for this 
> > concept)
> >
> >http://nuzban.wiw.org/wiki/index.php?Slang%20gismu
> 
> That is a suggested slang term. Has it actually seen usage? 

The lujvo was actually {tilju'idu'a}. I can't imagine how
{tilju'edu'u} could possibly mean "pedant". {tilju'edu'u}
might mean something like "wikiphobe". Yet another proof
that rafsi are packed too tight.

That meaning of {tilju} has seen usage, it was created during 
usage (by tsali?) and only for the moment. I was there, during 
an irc conversation. The lujvo was mine. In any case, nobody 
proposed that it should ever be used again. 

mu'o mi'e xorxes