From cowan@ccil.org Thu Sep 20 04:06:54 2001
Return-Path: <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
X-Sender: cowan@mercury.ccil.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_2); 20 Sep 2001 11:06:53 -0000
Received: (qmail 60760 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2001 11:06:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142)
  by 10.1.1.222 with QMQP; 20 Sep 2001 11:06:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mercury.ccil.org) (192.190.237.102)
  by mta3 with SMTP; 20 Sep 2001 11:06:53 -0000
Received: from cowan by mercury.ccil.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
  id 15k1fT-0006v5-00; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 07:06:55 -0400
Subject: Re: [lojban] OFF TOPIC? Re-evaluation + an idea - Was: A parable
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0109200302500.11066-100000@reva.sixgirls.org> from
  Invent Yourself at "Sep 20, 2001 03:21:39 am"
To: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 07:06:55 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E15k1fT-0006v5-00@mercury.ccil.org>
X-eGroups-From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>

Invent Yourself scripsit:

> > I can honestly see these two together for their whole lives - the
> > feeling with them is something like cranes come home to roost at the
> > end of the day.
> 
> I wonder how common this is to China at large. And how much of this is
> being eroded by It Is Glorious To Get Rich.

AFAIK the Chinese have *always* thought it was Glorious To Get Rich (And
Live Forever Too). Most of what Westerners think of as typically
Chinese is either an ancient import (Buddhism), a home-grown counterculture
(Taoism), or a modern import (Marxism). Not to say that Taoism didn't
also become a method of Getting Rich and Living Forever.

> Extreme Relativity, therefore, is an intermediate stage before a greater,
> synthesized rationalism that incorporates what sat previously beyond the
> boundary of the reasonable.

Or else it isn't.

"An open mind should presumably be open at both ends, like the food-pipe,
with the capability of excretion as well as ingestion."
--Northrop Frye

"It's good to have an open mind, but not so open that your brains fall out."

-- 
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org
Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact,
at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door.
--sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan

