From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Thu Sep 20 04:50:16 2001
Return-Path: <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_2); 20 Sep 2001 11:50:15 -0000
Received: (qmail 33713 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2001 11:50:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 20 Sep 2001 11:50:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 20 Sep 2001 11:50:15 -0000
Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer);
  Thu, 20 Sep 2001 12:27:57 +0100
Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk
  with Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 12:58:24 +0100
Message-Id: <sba9e7f0.000@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 12:58:04 +0100
To: lojban <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Laadan [was: Re: [lojban] A revised ce'u proposal involving si'o (fwd)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
From: And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>

>>> michael helsem <graywyvern@hotmail.com> 09/20/01 01:45am >>>
#>From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>
#>Actually, Laadan was more thoroughly designed than you give it credit
#>for. SHE did write it up in a book, and apparently there has been a smal=
l
#>circle of people who got to minimal conversational ability with it.
#yes; i have the book, & while it's not as thorough as a poet
#might wish, it does lay out enough to get started. and i have
#to say, it is an interesting sketch. but it hasn't received
#the intense usage & development that Klingon (which started
#at about the same point) has seen. i'm not even sure if anyone
#besides the inventor has written in it...

According to SHE, there were groups of Laadan users. But a Women's
Conlang is most unlikely to grow to life, because on the whole women
have 'better' things to do than devote unjustifiably immense energies
to breathing life into a conlang. That's (I surmise) a male thing to do,=20
and it seems that the conlang must have geek appeal, as Klingon=20
and Loglan in their different ways do. (The more usual example of
the phenomenon of men putting unjustifiably immense energies
into things is, in Britain at least, being a football supporter.)

--And.


