From araizen@newmail.net Thu Sep 20 07:52:11 2001
Return-Path: <araizen@newmail.net>
X-Sender: araizen@newmail.net
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_2); 20 Sep 2001 14:52:11 -0000
Received: (qmail 23033 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2001 14:52:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 20 Sep 2001 14:52:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mailgw1.netvision.net.il) (194.90.1.14)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 20 Sep 2001 14:52:01 -0000
Received: from oemcomputer (ras3-p70.rvt.netvision.net.il [62.0.182.70])
  by mailgw1.netvision.net.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA26494;
  Thu, 20 Sep 2001 17:51:56 +0300 (IDT)
Message-ID: <01b901c141ec$58c9ec00$95b4003e@oemcomputer>
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>, "Bob LeChevalier \(lojbab\)" <lojbab@lojban.org>
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010919182430.00e58220@pop.cais.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] META : Who is everyone (and what are they saying)
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 17:52:36 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
From: "Adam Raizen" <araizen@newmail.net>

la lojbab. cusku di'e

> At 02:00 AM 9/19/01 +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote:
> >As for {ckaji le ka daplu}, can something that is not daplu
> >have the property of being daplu? I can't see any difference
> >between {ko'a daplu} and {ko'a ckaji le ka ce'u daplu}.
>
> Which is one reason why I haven't bought into the current concept of
> ka. Using the ideas of fuzzy logic it is quite possible for
something to
> display some of the characteristics of ce'u broda, but not all of
them.

What is the difference? If x has the property of 'ka ce'u daplu' to
degree .8, then 'xy. daplu' is true to degree .8, just as 'xy. ckaji
le ka ce'u daplu' is.

mu'o mi'e .adam.