From ragnarok@pobox.com Sun Sep 23 11:54:41 2001
Return-Path: <raganok@intrex.net>
X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_2); 23 Sep 2001 18:54:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 28548 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2001 18:54:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142)
  by 10.1.1.222 with QMQP; 23 Sep 2001 18:54:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.250)
  by mta3 with SMTP; 23 Sep 2001 18:54:37 -0000
Received: from Craig [209.42.200.34] by intrex.net
  (SMTPD32-5.05) id AFEE5C5A00CE; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 14:54:38 -0400
Reply-To: <ragnarok@pobox.com>
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] ko'a
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 14:54:37 -0400
Message-ID: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFAEPNCDAA.raganok@intrex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <001e01c14454$ee59f8e0$d224ca3e@oemcomputer>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-eGroups-From: "Craig" <raganok@intrex.net>
From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>

>How long does ko'a keep the same value? If I introduce {le brode goi ko'a}
>and later say {le broda goi ko'a}, can it be assumed that the most likely
>meaning is {ko'a brode je broda}. To *humanly* reinforce that meaning, I
>might choose the second to be {ko'a goi le broda} ; but both in theory have
>the same semantic meaning.

ko'a keeps its value until given a new one. However, goi just says that ko'a
and broda have the same value. So, I can say "ko'a goi ko'e" when neither is
assigned, then assign one and have them have the same referent. To get rid
of the old value, unfortunately, I believe it is necessary to unassign ALL
ko'a- and fo'a-series cmavo.

--la kreig.daniyl.

'segu le bavli temci gi mi'o renvi lo purci
.i ga le fonxa janbe gi du mi'
-la djimis.BYFet

xy.sy. gubmau ckiku nacycme: 0x5C3A1E74