From cowan@ccil.org Sun Sep 23 19:50:46 2001
Return-Path: <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
X-Sender: cowan@mercury.ccil.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_2); 24 Sep 2001 02:49:59 -0000
Received: (qmail 50384 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2001 02:49:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27)
  by 10.1.1.221 with QMQP; 24 Sep 2001 02:49:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mercury.ccil.org) (192.190.237.102)
  by mta2 with SMTP; 24 Sep 2001 02:50:43 -0000
Received: from cowan by mercury.ccil.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
  id 15lLpQ-00013n-00; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 22:50:40 -0400
Subject: Re: [lojban] Dumb answers to good questions
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010923205615.00daa220@pop.cais.com> from "Bob LeChevalier
  (lojbab)" at "Sep 23, 2001 09:04:45 pm"
To: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 22:50:39 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E15lLpQ-00013n-00@mercury.ccil.org>
X-eGroups-From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>

Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) scripsit:

> OK, then bi'u/bi'unai is indeed the focus marker, since it marks the piece 
> of key information as being either new or old information. Just marking it 
> says that it is key, of course.

I don't think so: consider "It was George who hit the (bi'u) man."

-- 
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org
Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact,
at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door.
--sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan

