From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Tue Sep 25 08:54:56 2001
Return-Path: <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_2); 25 Sep 2001 15:53:57 -0000
Received: (qmail 43882 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2001 15:47:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by 10.1.1.221 with QMQP; 25 Sep 2001 15:47:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 25 Sep 2001 15:48:22 -0000
Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer);
  Tue, 25 Sep 2001 16:25:42 +0100
Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk
  with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 16:56:38 +0100
Message-Id: <sbb0b746.071@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 16:56:24 +0100
To: lojbab <lojbab@lojban.org>, cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
Cc: lojban <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Dumb answers to good questions
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
From: And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>

>>> "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org> 09/24/01 10:28pm #>>>
#At 10:50 PM 9/23/01 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
#>Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) scripsit:
#>
#> > OK, then bi'u/bi'unai is indeed the focus marker, since it marks the p=
iece
#> > of key information as being either new or old information. Just=20
#> marking it
#> > says that it is key, of course.
#>
#>I don't think so: consider "It was George who hit the (bi'u) man."
#
#I don't get it. You could literally translate that into Lojban, with the=
=20
#bi'u as marked, but why is the bi'u there if NOT to mark focus, and if "It=
=20
#was George" that is the focus, and presumably the key information, why is=
=20
#it *not* marked - I mean if the listener already knows it, it isn't that=20
#important, and "the man" presumably is; and if the listener doesn't know=20
#it, and you are bothering to mark bi'u, then it should be marked.

The example should be "hit a/this bi'u man" or "hit the bi'unai man"

George is focus. 'a'/'bi'u' indicates that the man has been referred to=20
already and is not being introduced into the discourse for the first
time.

You add bi'u(nai) to guide the addressee in identifying the referent.

--And.


