Subject: Re: [lojban] zipf computations & experimental cmavo

From: John Cowan <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:18:07 -0400

Pierre Abbat wrote:

> I agree (e.g. noltrube'a -> noltube, not that I think we should actually 
> shorten noltrube'a).

It is already perfectly legitimate to omit rafsi from long lujvo;
The Book already talks about omitting SE from the seltau, and
there is also leaving out -kem- and -kez- and other machinery.

> [N]ot many of us will need 
> {glaukysedyterjo'e}, but if we do need to talk about them, we will use the 
> word a lot in one article.

Then bind it to broda.

-- 
Not to perambulate || John Cowan <[email-masked]>
the corridors || http://www.reutershealth.com
during the hours of repose || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
in the boots of ascension. \\ Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel