From araizen@newmail.net Wed Sep 26 05:54:26 2001
Return-Path: <araizen@newmail.net>
X-Sender: araizen@newmail.net
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_2); 26 Sep 2001 12:53:40 -0000
Received: (qmail 58954 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2001 12:53:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by 10.1.1.223 with QMQP; 26 Sep 2001 12:53:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mailgw2.netvision.net.il) (194.90.1.9)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 26 Sep 2001 12:54:24 -0000
Received: from oemcomputer (ras2-p115.rvt.netvision.net.il [62.0.180.244])
  by mailgw2.netvision.net.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA04355
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 14:54:22 +0200 (IST)
Message-ID: <03d101c1468a$8538ae00$d8b5003e@oemcomputer>
To: "lojban list" <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
References: <002701c14651$04729d00$d120ca3e@oemcomputer>
Subject: Re: [lojban] le broda be brode be'o
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 14:55:10 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
From: "Adam Raizen" <araizen@newmail.net>

la greg. cusku di'e

> does the grammatical construct {le broda be brode be'o ku} mean
anything?

No, it is not grammatical. After 'be' and 'bei' there must be a term
(a sumti or a tagged sumti).

mu'o mi'e .adam.