From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Wed Sep 26 09:14:50 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_2); 26 Sep 2001 16:14:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 67652 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2001 16:14:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 26 Sep 2001 16:14:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3) by mta1 with SMTP; 26 Sep 2001 16:14:49 -0000 Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer); Wed, 26 Sep 2001 16:20:16 +0100 Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 16:51:17 +0100 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2 Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 16:51:00 +0100 To: lojban Subject: Re: [lojban] Dumb answers to good questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline From: And Rosta Xod: #> There are plenty of languages which are different to go around. #I thought the idea was that Lojban is "more different" than any other,=20 I don't know if anyone's claimed that, but it's a baseless claim, because AFAIK nobody knows enough about Lojban and the 6000 surviving natlangs to make a valid judgement. --And.