From jcowan@reutershealth.com Wed Sep 26 13:42:36 2001
Return-Path: <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
X-Sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_2); 26 Sep 2001 20:42:35 -0000
Received: (qmail 54877 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2001 20:42:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 26 Sep 2001 20:42:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.reutershealth.com) (204.243.9.36)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 26 Sep 2001 20:42:34 -0000
Received: from reutershealth.com (IDENT:cowan@[192.168.3.11])
  by mail.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA06766;
  Wed, 26 Sep 2001 16:44:01 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3BB23DA7.1010008@reutershealth.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 16:42:15 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20010913
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
Cc: lojban <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Set of answers encore
References: <sbb22d9a.069@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>

And Rosta wrote:

> My preferred solution would be to make the distinction on the x2, not
> on the selbri, but thinking about it, it does seem that we really are
> dealing with a selbri distinction.

Your examples are thought-provoking, but unfortunately for you
tend to push me in the other way: "believe" is just inherently a
fuzzy notion, I now think, and there's simply no way to draw
the line between "X believes p" and "X would believe p if he
had a clue" and "X will come to believe p if jogged a bit."

In short, "{p | John believes p} is a prototypical category.
Prototype beliefs include "Aristarchus believed the
sun was at the center of the universe" and "I believe I have
money in my pocket", but what to do with "Jim (a mouse)
believes that Tom (a cat) will catch him and eat him" is a puzzlement.

Dennett makes some distinction between beliefs and opinions,
which is not krici/jinvi, but if I understand it is about what
we act on vs. what we are willing to assent to: Jim has
beliefs but not opinions (Mickey has both); I have both;
there are many more beliefs than opinions; almost all
beliefs are true, on pain of nonsurvival; opinions can be true
or false without very grave consequences much of the time.

-- 
Not to perambulate || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
the corridors || http://www.reutershealth.com
during the hours of repose || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
in the boots of ascension. \\ Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel


