From jorge@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xxx Sun Dec 20 18:04:42 1998 X-Digest-Num: 31 Message-ID: <44114.31.111.959273824@eGroups.com> Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1998 23:04:42 -0300 From: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?Jorge_J._Llamb=EDas?=" From: Richard Curnow > >If the candidate lujvo starts CVC CVC CVC ..., and would break into a >cmavo and a shorter brivla, I am struggling to see how it can break >other than after the first CV, leaving the shorter brivla being all >but the initial 2 letters. In this case, the test would just be >whether the 3rd and 4th letters form an initial consonant pair, and >would not require checking of other 'joints' as described in the >document, or of the form of the trailing 'X' part of the lujvo. Example: "tosmapku" does not fail the test, it cannot break into "to sma-pku" because "pku" is not a possible rafsi, so it can only be "tos-mapku". Similarly, "tostostostostosmapku" is also ok, because it cannot break into "to sto-sto-sto-sto-sma-pku", so you need to check all the way down. co'o mi'e xorxes.