From jcowan@reutershealth.com Thu Sep 27 13:22:57 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 27 Sep 2001 20:22:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 3754 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2001 20:22:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by 10.1.4.56 with QMQP; 27 Sep 2001 20:22:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.reutershealth.com) (204.243.9.36) by mta1 with SMTP; 27 Sep 2001 20:22:46 -0000 Received: from reutershealth.com (IDENT:cowan@[192.168.3.11]) by mail.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA18711 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 16:24:18 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3BB38A86.7000802@reutershealth.com> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 16:22:30 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20010913 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] The Pleasures of goi (was: zipf computations &experimentalcmavo References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: John Cowan Craig wrote: > How does this differ from {The killer, Judas} in both cases? That could be either but is probably no'u, because of the comma. In a context where I talk about both George Bush and Jeb Bush, la buc. po'u la djordj would be appropriate. Where only George Bush is under discussion, it would be la buc. no'u la djordj. do ba'o du la bria,yn .iku'i do pu'o du la brai,yn po'u la brai,yn. (I know that's not what Reg says.) -- Not to perambulate || John Cowan the corridors || http://www.reutershealth.com during the hours of repose || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan in the boots of ascension. \\ Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel