From ragnarok@pobox.com Thu Sep 27 14:58:46 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 27 Sep 2001 21:57:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 79409 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2001 21:57:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by 10.1.1.221 with QMQP; 27 Sep 2001 21:57:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.250) by mta2 with SMTP; 27 Sep 2001 21:58:45 -0000 Received: from Craig [209.42.200.34] by intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id A1161EEA02A2; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 17:58:46 -0400 Reply-To: To: Subject: RE: [lojban] Bad Mailing List Behavior Considered Harmful (was: The Pleasures ofgoi (was: zipf computations & experimental cmavo)) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 17:58:43 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: X-eGroups-From: "Craig" From: "Craig" >This article is full of direct lies and slanted spin, and it should not be >used as a policy recommendation for anything. No, the article is out of date and is obsessed with Elm. I have seen it argued better. I would rather have to remove a name than have to type one in, myself. And I do sometimes send personal mails. But, as I have said, we should both shut up as we will never convince each other. --la kreig.daniyl. 'segu le bavli temci gi mi'o renvi lo purci .i ga le fonxa janbe gi du mi' -la djimis.BYFet xy.sy. gubmau ckiku nacycme: 0x5C3A1E74