From ragnarok@pobox.com Thu Sep 27 14:58:46 2001
Return-Path: <raganok@intrex.net>
X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 27 Sep 2001 21:57:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 79409 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2001 21:57:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27)
  by 10.1.1.221 with QMQP; 27 Sep 2001 21:57:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.250)
  by mta2 with SMTP; 27 Sep 2001 21:58:45 -0000
Received: from Craig [209.42.200.34] by intrex.net
  (SMTPD32-5.05) id A1161EEA02A2; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 17:58:46 -0400
Reply-To: <ragnarok@pobox.com>
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] Bad Mailing List Behavior Considered Harmful (was: The Pleasures ofgoi (was: zipf computations & experimental cmavo))
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 17:58:43 -0400
Message-ID: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFEEBICEAA.raganok@intrex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0109271722020.7433-100000@reva.sixgirls.org>
X-eGroups-From: "Craig" <raganok@intrex.net>
From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>

>This article is full of direct lies and slanted spin, and it should not be
>used as a policy recommendation for anything.

No, the article is out of date and is obsessed with Elm. I have seen it
argued better. I would rather have to remove a name than have to type one
in, myself. And I do sometimes send personal mails. But, as I have said, we
should both shut up as we will never convince each other.

--la kreig.daniyl.

'segu le bavli temci gi mi'o renvi lo purci
.i ga le fonxa janbe gi du mi'
-la djimis.BYFet

xy.sy. gubmau ckiku nacycme: 0x5C3A1E74