From ragnarok@pobox.com Thu Sep 27 15:02:39 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 27 Sep 2001 22:02:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 58653 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2001 22:02:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by 10.1.4.56 with QMQP; 27 Sep 2001 22:02:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.250) by mta2 with SMTP; 27 Sep 2001 22:02:39 -0000 Received: from Craig [209.42.200.34] by intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id A1FCD21E009A; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 18:02:36 -0400 Reply-To: To: "lojban list" Subject: RE: [lojban] periodic hexadecimal reminder Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 18:02:34 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: <05ed01c1479d$64ebd820$d8b5003e@oemcomputer> X-eGroups-From: "Craig" From: "Craig" >su'ipasu'ipasu'ipasu'ipa", etc. If you can be sure that a single digit >is unambiguous (I've seen T and E used for the extra digits in >duodecimal, though in Lojban this probably won't be a problem up to >hex), then you could use (radix-1)+1. No, you could use radix-1. Radix-1+1 = radix, and is always pano. Also, once you get to trying to say base 17 lojban has problems. --la kreig.daniyl. 'segu le bavli temci gi mi'o renvi lo purci .i ga le fonxa janbe gi du mi' -la djimis.BYFet xy.sy. gubmau ckiku nacycme: 0x5C3A1E74