From ragnarok@pobox.com Thu Sep 27 15:02:39 2001
Return-Path: <raganok@intrex.net>
X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 27 Sep 2001 22:02:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 58653 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2001 22:02:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27)
  by 10.1.4.56 with QMQP; 27 Sep 2001 22:02:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.250)
  by mta2 with SMTP; 27 Sep 2001 22:02:39 -0000
Received: from Craig [209.42.200.34] by intrex.net
  (SMTPD32-5.05) id A1FCD21E009A; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 18:02:36 -0400
Reply-To: <ragnarok@pobox.com>
To: "lojban list" <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] periodic hexadecimal reminder
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 18:02:34 -0400
Message-ID: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFKEBICEAA.raganok@intrex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
In-Reply-To: <05ed01c1479d$64ebd820$d8b5003e@oemcomputer>
X-eGroups-From: "Craig" <raganok@intrex.net>
From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>

>su'ipasu'ipasu'ipasu'ipa", etc. If you can be sure that a single digit
>is unambiguous (I've seen T and E used for the extra digits in
>duodecimal, though in Lojban this probably won't be a problem up to
>hex), then you could use (radix-1)+1.

No, you could use radix-1. Radix-1+1 = radix, and is always pano. Also, once
you get to trying to say base 17 lojban has problems.

--la kreig.daniyl.

'segu le bavli temci gi mi'o renvi lo purci
.i ga le fonxa janbe gi du mi'
-la djimis.BYFet

xy.sy. gubmau ckiku nacycme: 0x5C3A1E74