From pycyn@aol.com Thu Sep 27 16:40:48 2001
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 27 Sep 2001 23:40:48 -0000
Received: (qmail 75233 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2001 23:40:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by 10.1.4.54 with QMQP; 27 Sep 2001 23:40:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r07.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.103)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 27 Sep 2001 23:40:47 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com
  by imo-r07.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.7.) id r.14e.1af04a8 (3851)
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:40:41 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <14e.1af04a8.28e512f9@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:40:41 EDT
Subject: Re: [lojban] Set of answers encore
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_14e.1af04a8.28e512f9_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10535
From: pycyn@aol.com

--part1_14e.1af04a8.28e512f9_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 9/27/2001 2:23:07 PM Central Daylight Time, 
rob@twcny.rr.com writes:


> > la djan krici da poi go ke'a jetnu gi la bil klama
> 
> "John believes something such that it is true iff Bill goes to it"?
> 

Well, without the "to it," which isn't there and doesn't make much sense.

araizen:
<How about 'jinvi', 'djuno', 'krici', 'tugni', 'sarxe', etc. all
default to extensional, and then the intensional sense can be had with
a tanru or lujvo using 'pensi' (or maybe 'te sidbo'). If x both
extensionally believes that y and also thinks about or forms an idea
about y then x intensionally believes that y, no?>
Not quite, the idea has to be in some sense isomorphic to some version of 
what the person believes extensionally -- and working out the sense can be a 
bit of a pain, especially when identity/equivalence gets to play a part.


--part1_14e.1af04a8.28e512f9_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"><FONT SIZE=2>In a message dated 9/27/2001 2:23:07 PM Central Daylight Time, rob@twcny.rr.com writes:
<BR>
<BR>
<BR><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">&gt; &nbsp;&nbsp;la djan krici da poi go ke'a jetnu gi la bil klama
<BR>
<BR>"John believes something such that it is true iff Bill goes to it"?
<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
<BR>Well, without the "to it," which isn't there and doesn't make much sense.
<BR>
<BR>araizen:
<BR>&lt;How about 'jinvi', 'djuno', 'krici', 'tugni', 'sarxe', etc. all
<BR>default to extensional, and then the intensional sense can be had with
<BR>a tanru or lujvo using 'pensi' (or maybe 'te sidbo'). If x both
<BR>extensionally believes that y and also thinks about or forms an idea
<BR>about y then x intensionally believes that y, no?&gt;
<BR> Not quite, the idea has to be in some sense isomorphic to some version of what the person believes extensionally -- and working out the sense can be a bit of a pain, especially when identity/equivalence gets to play a part.
<BR></FONT></HTML>

--part1_14e.1af04a8.28e512f9_boundary--

