From xod@sixgirls.org Thu Sep 27 22:17:18 2001
Return-Path: <xod@reva.sixgirls.org>
X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 28 Sep 2001 05:17:18 -0000
Received: (qmail 13554 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2001 05:17:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27)
  by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 28 Sep 2001 05:17:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (64.152.7.13)
  by mta2 with SMTP; 28 Sep 2001 05:17:05 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]])
  by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f8S5H4J21899
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 01:17:04 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 01:17:04 -0400 (EDT)
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: periodic hexadecimal reminder
In-Reply-To: <9p0vvs+nftu@eGroups.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0109280116330.21838-100000@reva.sixgirls.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>

On Fri, 28 Sep 2001 thinkit8@lycos.com wrote:

> --- In lojban@y..., pycyn@a... wrote:
> > Ummmm. Is it not the case that the base of a number when specified
> by {ju'u}
> > has to be given in decimal, the Lojbanic default? If it were given
> in some
> > other base, that would have to be specified by another {ju'u} in
> decimal --
> > and so on back. So, specifying bases does not seem to be a real
> problem (or
> > have I missed something dropping in late on this from indirect-
> question-land?)
>
>
> hexadecimal is the lojbanic default.



When was it made official?



-- 
It's said that Mullah Omar has met two non-Muslims in his life. Others say
even that's not true.

Sami ul-Haq, Osama bin Laden's closest friend in Pakistan, runs the
"University for the Education of Truth," a fundamentalist institution that
educated and trained nine out of the Taliban's top 10 leaders.



