From jjllambias@hotmail.com Fri Sep 28 06:41:17 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 28 Sep 2001 13:41:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 80281 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2001 13:41:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 28 Sep 2001 13:41:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.50) by mta2 with SMTP; 28 Sep 2001 13:41:16 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 06:41:16 -0700 Received: from 200.49.74.2 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 13:41:16 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.49.74.2] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] Language of Logic and Logical Language. Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 13:41:16 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Sep 2001 13:41:16.0774 (UTC) FILETIME=[3F654060:01C14823] From: "Jorge Llambias" la pycyn cusku di'e >I've started again on a general introduction to the relation between the >language of logic and Lojban, at >http://hometown.aol.com/pycyn/logicallanguage.html. Comments about this >approach, question, suggestions about what needs to be in this (if this >needs >to exist at all), etc. etc. etc. greatly appreciated (though not >necessarily >agreed with, but still heeded). Very nice! I would appreciate a little note saying that all terms mentioned so far are meant to have single referents. (I find the mythical claim that Lojban does not have an obligatory singular-plural distinction very misleading, when not properly explained.) I can't wait for the juicy mess of quantifiers! mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp