From rob@twcny.rr.com Fri Sep 28 12:44:01 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: rob@twcny.rr.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 28 Sep 2001 19:42:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 19114 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2001 19:42:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by 10.1.1.220 with QMQP; 28 Sep 2001 19:42:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailout5.nyroc.rr.com) (24.92.226.122) by mta3 with SMTP; 28 Sep 2001 19:44:00 -0000 Received: from mail1.twcny.rr.com (mail1-0 [24.92.226.74]) by mailout5.nyroc.rr.com (8.11.6/Road Runner 1.12) with ESMTP id f8SJhwo26677 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:43:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from riff ([24.92.246.4]) by mail1.twcny.rr.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-59787U250000L250000S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:41:38 -0400 Received: from rob by riff with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15n3VX-0000Ct-00 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:41:11 -0400 Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:40:57 -0400 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Set of answers encore Message-ID: <20010928154057.A495@twcny.rr.com> Reply-To: rob@twcny.rr.com References: <14e.1af04a8.28e512f9@aol.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <14e.1af04a8.28e512f9@aol.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i X-Is-It-Not-Nifty: www.sluggy.com From: Rob Speer On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 07:40:41PM -0400, pycyn@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 9/27/2001 2:23:07 PM Central Daylight Time, > rob@twcny.rr.com writes: > > > > > la djan krici da poi go ke'a jetnu gi la bil klama > > > > "John believes something such that it is true iff Bill goes to it"? > > > > Well, without the "to it," which isn't there and doesn't make much sense. I was interpreting the sides of the go...gi as separate bridi which would follow the poi, and thus each would require a ke'a, explicit or implied. Perhaps this is not the case. For clarity, I'd suggest {la djan krici da poi ke'a o lenu la bil klama cu jetnu}. -- la rab.spir noi sarji jo gumri