From rob@twcny.rr.com Fri Sep 28 13:10:39 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: rob@twcny.rr.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 28 Sep 2001 20:10:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 18117 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2001 20:10:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 28 Sep 2001 20:10:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailout6.nyroc.rr.com) (24.92.226.125) by mta1 with SMTP; 28 Sep 2001 20:10:38 -0000 Received: from mail1.twcny.rr.com (mail1-0 [24.92.226.74]) by mailout6.nyroc.rr.com (8.11.6/Road Runner 1.12) with ESMTP id f8SK9cH05960 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:09:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from riff ([24.92.246.4]) by mail1.twcny.rr.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-59787U250000L250000S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:04:43 -0400 Received: from rob by riff with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15n3r6-0000EK-00 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:03:28 -0400 Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:03:00 -0400 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Bad Mailing List Behavior Considered Harmful (was: ThePleasures ofgoi (was: zipf computations & experimental cmavo)) Message-ID: <20010928160300.B495@twcny.rr.com> Reply-To: rob@twcny.rr.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i X-Is-It-Not-Nifty: www.sluggy.com From: Rob Speer On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 10:13:08PM -0400, Craig wrote: > >I never have to type one in. Does that mean my mailer good and yours is > >broken? > > Both you and la rab.spir. have said something along these lines, thinking > you are disagreeing. .i oiro'e .i mi tugni la xod > If the reply-to was munged, then to send a personal > mail you would have to type the name in. .i je'e go galfi le se spuda gi mi bilga lenu batkyci'a lo mrilu judri sesau mi mrilu pa prenu .ije go na galfi le se spuda gi mi bilga lenu batkyci'a lo mrilu judri sesau mi mrilu lo girzu .i lenu mi mrilu lo girzu cu cafne zmadu lenu mi mrilu pa prenu > I will now shut up as I feel both > sides should, and will say no more on this topic unless asked a direct > question (e.g. "Does that mean my mailer is good and yours is broken?"). .i mi ba'o cusku do lesedu'u la'edi'u cu mabla cfila tadji lenu stigau lonu darlu .i e'o ko ba na cusku ra > I urge everyone on either side to do the same, as soon as they realize that > everything useful has already been said. .i seki'ubo ko to'e jundi le se mrilu porsi .i do na kakne lenu sistygau lonu casnu kei seva'u do -- la rab.spir noi sarji zo gumri