From pycyn@aol.com Fri Sep 28 13:30:12 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 28 Sep 2001 20:30:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 47358 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2001 20:30:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 28 Sep 2001 20:30:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m10.mx.aol.com) (64.12.136.165) by mta1 with SMTP; 28 Sep 2001 20:30:11 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-m10.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.7.) id r.13c.21ed7f6 (4463) for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:30:07 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <13c.21ed7f6.28e637cf@aol.com> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:30:07 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] Set of answers encore To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_13c.21ed7f6.28e637cf_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10535 From: pycyn@aol.com --part1_13c.21ed7f6.28e637cf_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/28/2001 2:46:20 PM Central Daylight Time, rob@twcny.rr.com writes: > I was interpreting the sides of the go...gi as separate bridi which would > follow the poi, and thus each would require a ke'a, explicit or implied. > Perhaps this is not the case. > > For clarity, I'd suggest {la djan krici da poi ke'a o lenu la bil klama cu > jetnu}. > Well, it is marked as a single complex bridi, so only one {ke'a} is strictly needed. as for your correction, {le du'u} makes more sense than {le nu} -- I'm not sure what it means for an event to be true. --part1_13c.21ed7f6.28e637cf_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/28/2001 2:46:20 PM Central Daylight Time, rob@twcny.rr.com writes:


I was interpreting the sides of the go...gi as separate bridi which would
follow the poi, and thus each would require a ke'a, explicit or implied.
Perhaps this is not the case.

For clarity, I'd suggest {la djan krici da poi ke'a o lenu la bil klama cu
jetnu}.


Well, it is marked as a single complex bridi, so only one {ke'a} is strictly needed.  as for your correction, {le du'u} makes more sense than {le nu} -- I'm not sure what it means for an event to be true. --part1_13c.21ed7f6.28e637cf_boundary--