From cowan@ccil.org Sat Sep 29 22:20:25 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: cowan@mercury.ccil.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 30 Sep 2001 05:20:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 93194 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2001 05:20:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 30 Sep 2001 05:20:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mercury.ccil.org) (192.190.237.102) by mta1 with SMTP; 30 Sep 2001 05:20:25 -0000 Received: from cowan by mercury.ccil.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 15nZ1q-0008Nx-00 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 01:20:38 -0400 Subject: Re: [lojban] Set of answers encore In-Reply-To: from And Rosta at "Sep 30, 2001 03:32:15 am" To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 01:20:38 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: X-eGroups-From: John Cowan From: John Cowan And Rosta scripsit: > I believe that the mainstream view among lojbanists is that everything > receives the extensional reading, except for LE du'u sumti, which are > intensional. I think nu is just as intensional, li'i too, and probably all the NUs, when you come right down to it. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact, at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door. --sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan