From ragnarok@pobox.com Sun Sep 30 10:28:51 2001
Return-Path: <raganok@intrex.net>
X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 30 Sep 2001 17:27:12 -0000
Received: (qmail 96381 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2001 17:27:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by 10.1.1.221 with QMQP; 30 Sep 2001 17:27:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.250)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 30 Sep 2001 17:28:49 -0000
Received: from Craig [209.42.200.34] by intrex.net
  (SMTPD32-5.05) id A651C210094; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 13:28:49 -0400
Reply-To: <ragnarok@pobox.com>
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] Re: The Pleasures of goi (was: zipf computations &experimental cmavo
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 13:28:44 -0400
Message-ID: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFIECHCEAA.raganok@intrex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0109301149280.2024-100000@reva.sixgirls.org>
X-eGroups-From: "Craig" <raganok@intrex.net>
From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>

>Can someone please paste a piece of text (preferrably in Lojban) which
>examples the problem that exists with goi?

.i la djan. goi ko'a klama le zarci .i la fred. goi ko'a viska lenu go'i

Are they the same person?
On the wiki, I proposed an experimental cmavo goi'a, where they are asserted
to be the same, but where
.i la djan. goi ko'a klama le zarci .i la fred. goi'a ko'a viska lenu go'i
reassigns ko'a, so they are not said to be the same. Assymetric goi does
this also, but if I understand the Book right (a big if) it is forbidden
under the baseline.

--la kreig.daniyl.

'segu le bavli temci gi mi'o renvi lo purci
.i ga le fonxa janbe gi du mi'
-la djimis.BYFet

xy.sy. gubmau ckiku nacycme: 0x5C3A1E74