Subject: Re: [lojban] Set of answers encore

From: "Adam Raizen" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 13:30:34 +0200

la .and. cusku di'e

> I believe that the mainstream view among lojbanists is that
everything
> receives the extensional reading, except for LE du'u sumti, which
are
> intensional.

Why would "le du'u <bridi>" be different from "le broda"? If 'le'
always refers to the extension, then doesn't "le du'u <bridi>" refer
to the extension of "du'u <bridi>"?

mu'o mi'e .adam.