From araizen@newmail.net Mon Oct 01 06:16:59 2001
Return-Path: <araizen@newmail.net>
X-Sender: araizen@newmail.net
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 1 Oct 2001 13:16:58 -0000
Received: (qmail 84615 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2001 13:16:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27)
  by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 1 Oct 2001 13:16:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mailgw2.netvision.net.il) (194.90.1.9)
  by mta2 with SMTP; 1 Oct 2001 13:16:57 -0000
Received: from oemcomputer (ras2-p29.rvt.netvision.net.il [62.0.180.158])
  by mailgw2.netvision.net.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA01039
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Mon, 1 Oct 2001 15:16:56 +0200 (IST)
Message-ID: <085a01c14a7b$815d6920$d8b5003e@oemcomputer>
To: "lojban" <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
References: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMKEIDEMAA.a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Set of answers encore
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 13:30:34 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
From: "Adam Raizen" <araizen@newmail.net>

la .and. cusku di'e

> I believe that the mainstream view among lojbanists is that
everything
> receives the extensional reading, except for LE du'u sumti, which
are
> intensional.

Why would "le du'u <bridi>" be different from "le broda"? If 'le'
always refers to the extension, then doesn't "le du'u <bridi>" refer
to the extension of "du'u <bridi>"?

mu'o mi'e .adam.