Subject: Re: [lojban] Set of answers encore

From: "Adam Raizen" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 14:55:50 +0200

la .and. cusku di'e

> #Whether or not {le tenfa be li 389017 bei li 1/3} is a good way
> #or not to refer to {li 73} is up to the speaker, and has nothing
> #to do with John's beliefs in (1).
>
> I agree IFF you leave the gadri as {le} -- le se nanca, le tenfa.
> If they're {le}, then (1-2) can rewrite as:

Why is there a difference between 'le' and 'lo' in terms of
extensionality? It seems to me that the ex/intensionality changes when
'lo broda' changes to 'da zo'u ge da broda gi da ...'. This how it's
normally described/defined, which is 'something which fits into the x1
place'. Clearly extensional.

mu'o mi'e .adam.