Subject: Re: [lojban] Set of answers encore

From: [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 12:41:27 EDT

In a message dated 10/1/2001 9:38:34 AM Central Daylight Time, 
[email-masked] writes:

> Because "le" sumti can be exported to the outermost bridi (and beyond),
> while "lo" sumti are quantified in the localmost bridi. 
> 
> Where we do have 'intensional contexts' they consist of a bridi that
> is sumti of an 'intensional predicate'. A lo sumti that occurs within
> such a bridi cannot be exported out of it, and hence is confined to
> the intensional context. The same is not true for "le". 
> 
> You are right that both "le" and "lo" are in themselves extensional.
> 

An interesting rule; whence cometh it? 
mi senva le nu le melba cu cinba mi