From graywyvern@hotmail.com Mon Oct 01 10:04:35 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: graywyvern@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 1 Oct 2001 17:02:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 13684 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2001 17:02:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by 10.1.1.220 with QMQP; 1 Oct 2001 17:02:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.237.90) by mta3 with SMTP; 1 Oct 2001 17:04:35 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 1 Oct 2001 10:04:31 -0700 Received: from 208.188.25.91 by lw7fd.law7.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 01 Oct 2001 17:04:31 GMT X-Originating-IP: [208.188.25.91] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: da'o [was: Re: [lojban] Re: The Pleasures of goi Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 17:04:31 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Oct 2001 17:04:31.0780 (UTC) FILETIME=[236CBE40:01C14A9B] From: "michael helsem" >From: mark@kli.org li'o >I think >{da'oru'e} is too wordy for single-cancel, which I think would be >very common (indeed, getting into the habit of saying {rodada'o} for >"everything" (instead of just {roda}) wouldn't be such a bad idea, >as {da} gets bound sometimes. i don't have a problem running through the DA-series, & even into subscripts; but to use a succession of statements involving RODA does tend to dilute the discourse & should be avoided anyway: let it remain somewhat arduous, as a warning... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The time when the Bill of Rights, or the providing of historical context or satire, is most precious and most necessary is always when it is being deprecated as too dangerous, irrelevant or inappropriate at the present time." --Alexander Cockburn _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp