From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Mon Oct 01 11:22:46 2001
Return-Path: <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 1 Oct 2001 18:20:59 -0000
Received: (qmail 78665 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2001 18:20:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27)
  by 10.1.1.221 with QMQP; 1 Oct 2001 18:20:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3)
  by mta2 with SMTP; 1 Oct 2001 18:22:45 -0000
Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer);
  Mon, 1 Oct 2001 18:59:53 +0100
Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk
  with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 01 Oct 2001 19:31:22 +0100
Message-Id: <sbb8c48a.013@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 19:30:59 +0100
To: lojban <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: new brivla (was: Re: [lojban] Set of answers encore
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
From: And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>

>>> <pycyn@aol.com> 10/01/01 05:41pm >>>
#(Oh, and I don't think even {du'u} creates an intensional environment, it'=
s=20
#all done with selbri)

It's 'caused' by the selbri, but you can't express it without du'u.
IOW, the selbri causes the du'u sumti to be intensional, but nondu'u sumti =
of that selbri would not be intensional.

Maybe somebody could express this clearer. I'm tired.

--And.