From xod@sixgirls.org Mon Oct 01 16:15:20 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 1 Oct 2001 23:13:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 74347 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2001 23:13:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by 10.1.1.223 with QMQP; 1 Oct 2001 23:13:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (64.152.7.13) by mta3 with SMTP; 1 Oct 2001 23:15:19 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f91NFIV21651 for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2001 19:15:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 19:15:18 -0400 (EDT) To: lojban Subject: RE: [lojban] The Pleasures of goi (was: zipf computations & experimental cmavo In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20011001182111.00dc1d40@pop.cais.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) wrote: > At 02:14 PM 10/1/01 +0100, And Rosta wrote: > >#ii) is not something we designed > >#ko'a to be used for, if I understand what you mean by it. If I wanted to > >#assign a cmene, I would not use goi, but rather ko'a noi se cmene [name] > >#(or ne me'e [name]) > > > >I think in this respect you're atypical of lojbanists. My sense is that > >there's > >nothing unorthodoz about using goi to assign a reference to a name, e.g. > >"le nanmu goi la djoblogz". > > I haven't ever seen that, but then I have to admit I read little Lojban > text these days. I've never seen it either. -- It's said that Mullah Omar has met two non-Muslims in his life. Others say even that's not true. Sami ul-Haq, Osama bin Laden's closest friend in Pakistan, runs the "University for the Education of Truth," a fundamentalist institution that educated and trained nine out of the Taliban's top 10 leaders.