From jjllambias@hotmail.com Mon Oct 01 17:16:27 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 2 Oct 2001 00:16:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 87666 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2001 00:16:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 2 Oct 2001 00:16:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.100) by mta1 with SMTP; 2 Oct 2001 00:16:23 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 1 Oct 2001 17:16:22 -0700 Received: from 200.69.11.142 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 02 Oct 2001 00:16:22 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.69.11.142] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] Set of answers encore Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2001 00:16:22 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Oct 2001 00:16:22.0945 (UTC) FILETIME=[77AEC110:01C14AD7] From: "Jorge Llambias" la adam cusku di'e >Why would "le du'u " be different from "le broda"? If 'le' >always refers to the extension, then doesn't "le du'u " refer >to the extension of "du'u "? Yes, but the extension of {du'u broda} preserves the intension of {broda}. {le broda} and {le brode}, for broda different than brode, can refer to the same extension, but {le du'u broda} will be a different extension than {le du'u brode}. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp