From thinkit8@lycos.com Wed Oct 03 23:29:03 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: thinkit8@lycos.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 4 Oct 2001 06:29:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 11249 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2001 06:29:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 4 Oct 2001 06:29:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO n21.groups.yahoo.com) (10.1.2.81) by mta1 with SMTP; 4 Oct 2001 06:29:03 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: thinkit8@lycos.com Received: from [10.1.10.103] by n21.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Oct 2001 06:29:03 -0000 Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 06:28:59 -0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: ge'e as attitudinal separator Message-ID: <9pgvjb+8d02@eGroups.com> User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 471 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster X-Originating-IP: 24.5.121.32 From: thinkit8@lycos.com on page 312 of the codex woldemar, it notes how "mi pu tavla do .o'onai .oi" can either mean that the .oi modifies the .o'onai (damn, i snapped at you), or they independently modify the do (i told you, you pest!). what about using ge'e to resolve the ambiguity. thus the first case is still do ".o'onai .oi", but the second case is "do .o'onai ge'e .oi". it's even hinted about on page 311. what do you think? i haven't found anything about this on the wiki.