From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Thu Oct 04 04:57:47 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 4 Oct 2001 11:57:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 24966 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2001 11:57:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 4 Oct 2001 11:57:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3) by mta2 with SMTP; 4 Oct 2001 11:57:46 -0000 Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer); Thu, 4 Oct 2001 12:34:50 +0100 Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk with Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 04 Oct 2001 13:07:00 +0100 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2 Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 13:06:34 +0100 To: lojban Subject: Re: [lojban] fancu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline From: And Rosta >>> 10/04/01 01:29am >>> #jjllambias@hotmail.com writes: #> Yes, I have always been on the set-of-answers camp, though I've #=20 #Gee, I wish you had said that before, rather than all the things that soun= d=20 #like the what-fills-the-makau-gap version, e.g. that {le du'u makau mamta= =20 #ceu} is the mother-of function or that my sets had to be wrong becaue they= =20 #were not { George, Fred, ....}. Sorry I misunderstood, but you did not ma= ke=20 #it easy to see your point.=20=20 Amazing! And here was I thinking that when you were talking about "The set-= of-answers analysis" you were referring to Jorge's analysis and that you supported it! --And.