From cowan@ccil.org Fri Oct 05 04:17:27 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: cowan@mercury.ccil.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 5 Oct 2001 11:17:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 60943 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2001 11:17:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by 10.1.1.222 with QMQP; 5 Oct 2001 11:17:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mercury.ccil.org) (192.190.237.102) by mta3 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2001 11:17:26 -0000 Received: from cowan by mercury.ccil.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 15pSz7-0008HV-00; Fri, 05 Oct 2001 07:17:41 -0400 Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: ge'e as attitudinal separator In-Reply-To: from Craig at "Oct 5, 2001 06:53:19 am" To: ragnarok@pobox.com Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 07:17:41 -0400 (EDT) Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: X-eGroups-From: John Cowan From: John Cowan Craig scripsit: > Also, you are expressing how you feel with them - it seems to me that if you > can say > > do > *iu > **oi > > Then you feel both {iu} and {oi} even if you feel one about the other. Absolutely. As specified in the Book, attitudinals themselves don't allow you to make this distinction. Precise distinctions are the domain of bridi. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact, at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door. --sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan