From jjllambias@hotmail.com Sat Oct 06 15:30:46 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 6 Oct 2001 22:30:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 83936 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2001 22:30:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by 10.1.1.222 with QMQP; 6 Oct 2001 22:30:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.102) by mta2 with SMTP; 6 Oct 2001 22:30:46 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 6 Oct 2001 15:30:46 -0700 Received: from 200.41.247.35 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sat, 06 Oct 2001 22:30:46 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.41.247.35] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: RE: [lojban] translation exercise Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2001 22:30:46 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Oct 2001 22:30:46.0325 (UTC) FILETIME=[8AD40650:01C14EB6] From: "Jorge Llambias" la and cusku di'e >i.e. {le fenki cu se kavbu pu le nu fy catra da} > >I don't think this is any good, because you're not talking about >each of certain specific events. Better would be > >{le fenki cu se kavbu pu ro co'e nu fy catra da} > >or somesuch. Yes, {le} is no good. Unlike {ro nu}, {le nu} = {le su'o nu} does have existential import. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp