From rob@twcny.rr.com Mon Oct 08 09:34:07 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: rob@twcny.rr.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 8 Oct 2001 16:34:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 37075 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2001 16:32:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 8 Oct 2001 16:32:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailout5.nyroc.rr.com) (24.92.226.169) by mta1 with SMTP; 8 Oct 2001 16:32:43 -0000 Received: from mail1.twcny.rr.com (mail1-0 [24.92.226.74]) by mailout5.nyroc.rr.com (8.11.6/Road Runner 1.12) with ESMTP id f98GWfo14059 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 12:32:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from riff ([24.92.246.4]) by mail1.twcny.rr.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-59787U250000L250000S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 12:31:44 -0400 Received: from rob by riff with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15qdJw-0000DF-00 for ; Mon, 08 Oct 2001 12:32:00 -0400 Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 12:32:00 -0400 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: noxemol ce'u Message-ID: <20011008123200.B775@twcny.rr.com> Reply-To: rob@twcny.rr.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i X-Is-It-Not-Nifty: www.sluggy.com From: Rob Speer On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 11:55:10AM -0400, pycyn@aol.com wrote: > > . I just don't see how debate > > can possibly be fruitful if we can't even agree that "le selbri be KOhA" is > > not a bridi. > > > > Is *that* an issue? It's news to me. I thought the issue was whether > {selbri be KOhA} was a bridi or BRIDI or whatever. That is, whether {le > selbri be KOhA} contained a bridi. And, of course, just what the criteria > for containing a bridi are. Sorry, I think part of the idea of ending the debate was that he (and I as well) doesn't want to deal with you jumping on trivialities. -- la rab.spir noi sarji zo gumri