From jjllambias@hotmail.com Mon Oct 08 15:14:18 2001
Return-Path: <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 8 Oct 2001 22:14:18 -0000
Received: (qmail 21811 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2001 21:45:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142)
  by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 8 Oct 2001 21:45:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.192)
  by mta3 with SMTP; 8 Oct 2001 21:45:46 -0000
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
  Mon, 8 Oct 2001 14:45:46 -0700
Received: from 200.69.11.253 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
  Mon, 08 Oct 2001 21:45:46 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [200.69.11.253]
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Bcc: 
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: fancu
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 21:45:46 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F192LAX3cf3ednHM3SO00000093@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Oct 2001 21:45:46.0768 (UTC) FILETIME=[9697D100:01C15042]
From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>


la pycyn cusku di'e

><
>"Does John know whether you have stopped beating your wife?"
>
>1- "Yes, he does. He knows that I don't even have a wife."
>
>2- "No, there's nothing for him to know about it. He knows
>    that I don't even have a wife." >

>I suppose the actual answer is { mi na'i co'u darxi lomi speni}

({na'i mi ...} otherwise na'i attaches to {mi} only.)

But then that supports my point. Or do you mean that to be the
answer that John knows? I still think "Does John know whether you
have stopped beating your wife?" has itself a presupposition which
is not fully buried inside the indirect question. I would answer
{na'i}, not {go'i}.

>(by the way,
>{darxi} by itself is not good for "beating" in htis context, nor is {co'u}
>for "stop")

Maybe {co'u ta'e darxi}?

>The fact that a question does not meet its presuppositions does not make it
>less of a question, it merely makes it one that has a peculiar correct
>answer.

One that has no correct logical answer, in my view. Correct
illocutionary answers it has aplenty, I agree.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


