Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: pau le xamgu misno

From: [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 19:48:10 EDT

In a message dated 10/9/2001 3:47:19 PM Central Daylight Time, 
[email-masked] writes:

> do po'o jinvi le du'u zoi gy. T .gy. dunli zo ty
> 
Oh, probably not. {po'o} is malglico as usual, though almost justifiable in 
this case.

That aside, what was wrong with the summary?