From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Thu Oct 11 12:37:12 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 11 Oct 2001 19:34:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 7417 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2001 19:34:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by 10.1.1.224 with QMQP; 11 Oct 2001 19:34:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.169.75.101) by mta1 with SMTP; 11 Oct 2001 19:37:10 -0000 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15rlQK-0007MF-00 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 12:23:16 -0700 Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 12:23:16 -0700 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] metre for hamlet Message-ID: <20011011122316.L8070@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com References: <000201c15288$919d0060$143203d5@oemcomputer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000201c15288$919d0060$143203d5@oemcomputer> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22i From: Robin Lee Powell On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 08:32:46PM +0200, G. Dyke wrote: > Nick has said that he could not really approve of any translation of > Hamlet that did not scan and I kind of agree. Uh, what? You'd have to convince me that the _original_ has metre of any kind before I could agree with this. -Robin, who is _very_ picky about metre. -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/